Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-05-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3282 HB 13 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 13(FIN) "An Act relating to reimbursement of municipal bonds for school construction; increasing the base student allocation used in the formula for state financing of public education; relating to the district cost factors for state funding of public education; relating to school improvement funding; and providing for an effective date" was read the third time. Senator Olson moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Olson offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 10, following line 5: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 5. AS 14.11.100(p) is amended to read: 2006-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3283 (p) The total amount of school construction projects approved for reimbursement by the department under (a)(13) and (a)(14) of this section (1) may not exceed $179,256,000 [$177,256,000]; (2) after June 30, 1999, and until October 31, 2006, shall be allocated as follows: (A) $61,925,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of 45,000 or more students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (B) $40,570,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 14,600 but less than 20,000 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (C) $20,000,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 10,000 but less than 14,600 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (D) $2,588,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 7,500 but less than 10,000 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (E) $5,995,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 4,000 but less than 6,000 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (F) $1,237,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 2,400 but less than 2,800 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (G) $1,100,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 2,200 but less than 2,400 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (H) $2,000,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 1,501 but less than 1,800 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; 2006-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3284 (I) [(H)] $7,164,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 1,300 but less than 1,500 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (J) [(I)] $1,260,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 740 but less than 757 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (K) [(J)] $608,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 650 but less than 700 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (L) [(K)] $32,000,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 500 but less than 600 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (M) [(L)] $2,809,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 370 but less than 390 students in fiscal year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 14, line 19: Delete "sec. 6" Insert "sec. 7" Page 14, line 20: Delete "sec. 11" Insert "sec. 12" Senator Olson moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Wilken objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2006-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3285 SCS CSHB 13(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Hoffman, Kookesh, Olson Nays: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Huggins, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 13(FIN) was automatically in third reading. Senator Ellis moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 2. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 1, line 6, through page 3, line 15: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 3, line 16: Delete "Sec. 3" Insert "Section 1" Page 14, lines 3 - 9: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 14, line 19: Delete "sec. 6" Insert "sec. 4" Page 14, line 20: Delete "sec. 11" Insert "sec. 7" 2006-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3286 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Senator Green objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 13(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Hoffman, Kookesh, Wagoner Nays: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Guess, Huggins, Olson, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wilken Therriault changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Dyson changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 13(FIN) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 13(FIN) "An Act relating to reimbursement of municipal bonds for school construction; increasing the base student allocation used in the formula for state financing of public education; relating to the district cost factors for state funding of public education; relating to school improvement funding; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 13(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Dates YEAS: 20 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Guess, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken 2006-05-07 Senate Journal Page 3287 and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 13(FIN) passed the Senate. Senator Gary Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Gary Stevens gave notice of reconsideration.